Tuesday, 14 February 2012
FIJI TRADES UNION CONGRESS - Media Release 14th February
FTUC Press Release No.17-04/12
STATE PROCEEDINGS (AMENDMENT) DECREE 2012
The free and democratic world is once again shocked to know about the new
State Proceedings (Amendment) Decree 2012 promulgated by the regime. It
came into force on 7th Feb, 2012.
The provision of the Decree gives immunity to the Prime Minister and his
Ministers from being sued for defamation, libel or slander for any comments they
make against anyone, either in their official or personal capacity. It provides that
no media organization can be held liable for publication of statements whether
written or verbal from the PM and his Cabinet Ministers.
The regime’s spin on the Decree is that it is intended to facilitate open and frank
discussion between Government, the public and other stakeholders in the lead up
to Fiji’s Parliamentary elections. The decree will expire upon the date when a
new Parliament is convened which will have its usual privileges for statements
made by Parliamentarians.
The question that begs an answer is that there is no Parliament and no Opposition
party so where does this privileged decree fit in with Parliamentary privilege
providing immunity to unelected government ministers. Parliamentary privilege
only applies to members of Parliament in Parliament and nowhere else.
The ordinary citizens have to be mindful of Media Decree and the Public Order
Amendment Decree when they make any opposing Statement against
government. The Decree basically allows the media to print the criticism from the
regime and gives a wholesale license to make personal and defamatory remarks
against their opponents in the lead up to the general elections in 2014. The
decree also raises questions on the intent of the Regime and why it should only
protect itself when they have no ulterior motives. Surely, if they spoke the truth
and had evidence, they do not need any such decree. The media equally need not
fear if it reported facts and exercised fairness. We ask, Why isn't the general
public also given the same privileges so that open and frank public discussion is
held on the future of the Country and her people? This would surely ensure a
"level playing field" that the AG is attempting to get the world to believe as his
real intention.
Professor Bill Hodge from Auckland University’s Law Faculty describes the Decree
as totally beserk, bananas and bizarre. He said the decree purports to change
fundamental rights which can only be done by Statute. We agree.
The State Proceedings (Amendment) Decree contradicts the Public Order
(Amendment) Decree which grants safeguards against defamation, libel and
slander. This contradiction surely points to the fact that the current sets of
Decrees are churned out by the regime in desperation for impending Constitution
Consultations and elections in 2014, if it happens.- Advice from Fiji Trade Union Congress - contact e-mail ftuc1@connect.com.fj